Harvesting, Chasing, & Wholesale Ballot Fraud
We were warned, and by an unexpected voice, Ex-Pres. Jimmy Carter: what of RCV?
Before mail-in voting was “a thing” it was called out as a threat to the democratic process in the Carter-Baker Commission Report sixteen years after the Commission report says, “many of the recommendations remain relevant. While the COVID-19 pandemic and record number of voters who cast absentee or mail-in ballots raised concerns about the security of the 2020 absentee process, the Carter-Baker report warned: “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
Pull Quote with emphasis…
“Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” Ex-President Jimmy Carter.
So how is it then that virtually every state adopted mail-in voting? Was it to spite Ex-President Carter, or was it all part of the “hanging chad” political theater? The entire argument hinged, literally, on whether a computer punch card was completely or partially punched. Notice the intensity of these two well meaning card inspectors, so so so serious.
Regardless, we were warned about mail-in voting and our elected officials did not heed the warning. Now we must endure a system where voters engage in what amounts to a live participation simulation, convinced by decades of conditioning, that when they cast a ballot their election —selection— matters.
What is ballot harvesting? The term is perceived to be negative, but there is no uniform definition of the activity.
Ballot harvesting is the collection of ballots that have not been voted/marked by the legitimately registered voter who received the ballot in the mail, leaving open the opportunity for a third party to mark the ballot instead of the recipient voter;
Ballot brokering is the collection of ballots that have not been voted/marked by a registered voter, and were never delivered to the voter but were intercepted at some point in the delivery process, leaving open the opportunity for a third party to mark the ballot instead of the recipient voter;
Ballot collection is the collection of ballots that have been voted/marked by the legitimately registered voter who received the ballot in the mail at a permitted address;
What is ballot chasing? Chasing ballots is a common practice for political parties and even some savvy candidates. Also termed "get out the vote” (GOTV) an individual representing a party or candidate will contact a voter who is on the mail-in ballot request list who has n to yet mailed in their ballot. This is known, because most counties will publish a daily list of those individuals who were sent a ballot and who have mailed their ballot back to be counted. While this allows GOTV election workers to encourage voters to participate, this practice is fraught with several problems.
Knowing who voted and their party preference creates a list of “those not voted” which, with current lose security protocols and standards, can be scraped and used for nefarious “ballot allocation.”
Knowing the split between major party returned ballots can be tempting to nefarious actors who can act internally —sovereign fraud— to activate inactive voters in the projected numbers needed to show a win, show they voted, then inactivate them shortly after the election is closed.
Regardless, self-imposed disenfranchisement comes as a result of hopelessness. Through ballot chasing, voters can be encouraged to find that someone cares about their vote.
And then there’s wholesale ballot fraud. While the Uniparty folks would have the world believe that there is no “widespread election fraud,” according to Michigan AG Dana Nessel, the massive mountain of evidence says otherwise. Take for example guys like this major POS who, as an actor for the Biden 2020 campaign, sought to actively undermine that election. Did this guy and his op have a hand in overthrowing state election in the 2022 General election?
According to the Gateway Pundit’s summary of investigative efforts, “On October 8, 2020. only one month before the 2020 general election, Muskegon, MI City Clerk Ann Meisch noticed a black female (whose name was redacted from the police report), dropping off between 8,000-10,000 completed voter registration applications at the city clerk’s office.
The Muskegon Police Department was contacted and asked to investigate. On 10/21/20 First Lieutenant Mike Anderson was contacted by Tom Fabus, Chief of Investigations for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s Office. According to the MI State Police report, Mr. Fabus asked for Michigan State Police assistance with a joint investigation of alleged voter fraud being conducted by the Muskegon Police Department and the AG.”
What, wait… Do you mean the same AG Dana Nessel who has gone on a scorched earth campaign to crush political descent.
Michigan State Police (MSP) records reveal, “On 10/16/20 Muskegon City Clerk Ann Meisch and Deputy Clerk Kimberly Young contacted the Muskegon Police Department after noticing irregularities in voter registration applications received both in person and by mail.
The Muskegon city clerk became suspicious when the female, (whose name is redacted in the first part of the police report, but then later, is unredacted), hand-delivered thousands of voter registrations to her office, many of them in the same handwriting.”
Then in the same report, “The MI State Police investigator assigned to the case spoke with the female suspect who explained that she was being paid $1150/week “to find un-registered voters and provide them with a form so they can get registered to vote or obtain their absentee ballot.” The only problem is, the handwriting on the voter registrations was the same on several of the registrations and many of the addresses were non-existent or fake.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Mark Finchem's Inside Track Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.