WI Voter Reg Roll ID Numbers a Problem

AA Voter Registration Rolls next in line for study, looking for cryptographic algorithms...

October 1, 2024, Prescott, AZ… Not long ago, Dr. Andrew Paquette began research to address the theory that fictitious voters could be widely distributed and hidden within voter rolls in select counties across the United States. For a very long time, voter roll pollution has been a known problem, even acknowledged in federal law under the Help America Vote Act of 2002,commonly known as HAVA. And the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), a federal agency, has urged states to "clean up" their voter rolls. But when researchers openly report on the unexplainable "fictitious voter" phenomenon, they are called "election deniers." Take note that it is a tactic of the Intelligence Community (IC) controlled media industrial complex that, until recently, has been subsurface in American politics, like a worm eating away at its host.

Paquette's research into Wisconsin voter rolls began in New York. New York State's voter rolls contain many irregularities. Among them, an estimated 2,000,000 illegal "clone" records. A clone is a record with two or more unique state identifiers or State IDs (SIDs). Clones are illegal under state and federal law because they allow for the generation of multiple ballots per voter
per election. (Full Report)

Summary of the theory, Wisconsin:

According to Dr. Paquette, If the clones were generated by administrative error or other innocent cause, there should be no way to track them separately from other records. However, if created for malicious use, malicious actors would want a way to covertly find the records. This led me to investigate whether voter roll data fields contained hidden attributes for covert tracking. The SID and County ID (CID) fields were the most likely candidates, given their uniqueness compared to names, birthdates, addresses, and other fields.

The investigation revealed that at least 4 algorithms were used as part of the ID assignment process (Paquette 2023). One algorithm allows very accurate predictions (99.34%) of voter status and whether the record is a clone. Another algorithm reveals deleted SID numbers and who those numbers were originally assigned to. This second algorithm, called "The Spiral," also adds an attribute to all records that is effectively a third, and very well-hidden, ID number. An Algorithm ID (AID).

What about other states?

The results of the NY investigation led me to check the records contained in New Jersey's voter rolls (Paquette 2024). These also revealed a pseudo-cryptographic artifact in their ID numbering system. It transformed the numbers from an original state —voter #1—to what is visible in the rolls. The transformation is reversible, making it possible to use the structure of the transformation as a way to covertly identify records of interest.

In yet another body of research involving the Ohio Voter Rolls, Paquette revealed hidden attributes attached to records in three of Ohio's most populous counties: Franklin, Lucas, and Montgomery. Those attributes would allow for covert tracking and identification of records of interest.

Separately, researcher Vico Bertogli of Pennsylvania discovered that Hawaii's voter