Yes, We Have a Two Tier Legal System

When judges ignore the facts and the law, the People groan

The Judicial branch has become fully weaponized against all who descent. Yes that means all who disagree with “the Bar” are at risk of being sent to the American gulag. Lawyers are threatened, investigated even disbarred for defending the interests of their clients vigorously, especially when there is a political disagreement. This has happened to many lawyers who had the courage to question the 2016, 2020 and even 2022 election process defects and how they affected people like me, Kari Lake and President Donald J. Trump. It is the paradox of the pampered and the persecuted. That is fact.

So how do we the People take action against judges who act outside of the law? There are three ways for a judge to be removed from the Arizona legal system.

1. Resignation. There could be many reasons for such move, perhaps a personal reason like family needs, health issues and maybe the desire to just move on.

2. A no confidence vote of “NO to Retain” a judge during a general election. Judges are appointed in Arizona, and must regularly stand before the people for retention. There hav e been few effective non-retention elections, but there have been a few effective non-retention campaigns.

3. Then there is impeachment, which is a Legislative action. To impeach a judge, first a Member of the House of Representatives must introduce the Articles of Impeachment. Impeachment is a very serious affair, according to Black’s Law Dictionary, “[T]o proceed against a public officer for crime or misfeasance, before a proper court, by the presentation of a written accusation called “articles of impeachment.”In the law of evidence.”¹ The House of Representatives holds a hearing, and then votes to either impeach or not. It is a simple majority vote, in Arizona there are 60 Representatives, 31 Republican, 29 Democrat. If the vote is to proceed with impeachment, then the action passes to the Senate to hold an impeachment trial. It takes a two-thirds majority to convict. In the Arizona Senate 16 seats are held by Republicans and 14 by Democrats; no two-thirds majority there. The process is governed by A.R.S. § 38-314 “Court of Impeachment:organization.² But if there were, this is what the Articles of Impeachment might look like.

In what is commonly now known as “lawfare” (legal warfare), the radical left has sought to pervert the law through judicial activism. On point is this fact, there is no provision in law for sanctions in CONTEST law. Election contestants must have complete latitude to scrutinize and question elections that are so filled with defects that every voter can see, if they only play attention; elections like the steaming garbage heap of an election —an international embarrassment— known as the Maricopa County Mid-term General Election. BS artists Bill Gates, Jack Sellers, Clint Hickman and Stephen Richer will be forever know as the men who destroyed Arizona, and quite possibly the United States. Now they —Hobbs and Fontes— will claim victory in Lake v. Hobbs, but seeing the evidence that the judge refused to acknowledge tells us all, there is a TWO TIED JUSTICE SYSTEM in America. It favors the in crowd, and dismisses the facts and laws we all rely on for transparent and secure election, in an effort to distort justice into something that the honorable among us know to be the work of pure evil.

So let us consider what an indictment, the Articles of Impeachment, might look like.