Anatomy of Lawfare and Sovereign Fraud...
How has racketeering become the norm in the lawyerly profession?
Prescott, AZ December 30, 2023… Respectable lawyers, who shall remain nameless for their protection, both personal and professional, no longer recognize the profession that they have engaged in for so many years. The lawyerly profession once relied upon ethical standards, and a board of peers all interested in maintaining an ethical bearing within the practice of legal representation for both victim and assailant, to keep their ilk both honest and protected. Those days are now gone.
Have we become a banana republic?
It is indeed shameful that such honorable men and women who sought to defend the notion of “equal protection under the laws,” enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, commonly known as the “Equal Protection Clause,” are now persecuted for doing the right thing. Today, justice has become an exclusive club at the hands of the very judicial officers once entrusted to mete out fairness in a court of law, those would be all members of The Bar.
Take for example organizations like the 65 Project1 that is outright gleeful about engaging in legal warfare —now known as lawfare— targeting anyone who would dare represent any individual who questions clearly defective elections. The very premise that the organization is built upon reveals what seems to be emerging as a “dog whistle” for those who seek to undermine the very existence of the United States.
The 65 Project is a parasite masquerading as a guardian of justice…
Let’s take just a moment and parse out the bold statement made on the Project 65 website. From the very start, we see the effect of either a severely broken educational system, or a purposeful deceit calling the United States a “democracy,” which it is not. “Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where 51% of the people disregard the rights of the other 49%.” While this statement was originally attributed to Thomas Jefferson, the Monticello website, allegedly the authoritative place for all things Jefferson, claims there is no record that he ever said that.2 It is true nonetheless, so I am happy to lay claim to the statement. Mob rule disguised as representative government is ungovernable, and that is why the framers of the Constitution of the United States constructed a democratically elected representative republic.
The battle between the two is one between consolidation of power and distribution of power, democracy being the former and a republic being the latter. So while the learned lawyerly types making up the Project 65 brain trust promote the notion of “defending democracy,” what they really are up to is the consolidation of power and vilification of anyone who disagrees with their worldview. In other words, shut down political dissent. What a strange world we would have if their Stalinist vision were to become the norm as opposed to the outlier.
The claim of, “a bipartisan effort to deter future abuse…”
Just because a group claims to be “bipartisan” as though their virtue-signaling is a badge of honor, matters little in the world of political warfare, and that is what this group is engaged in. It is the fruits of their labor that we must examine. The team of justice deniers includes Christine Durham, Roberta Cooper Ramo, Renee Kanake Jefferson, Paul Rozsenzwieg, Stuart Gerson, Michael Teter, Melissa Moss, Eddie Vale,3 do not seem to care about the lives they are ruining, both lawyers and plaintiffs alike. The crew reads like a who’s who of D.C. insiders intent on doing the bidding of the WEF.
As we examine the lawyers that this crew has targeted, it appears to be an emerging form of racketeering. There is indeed a two-tier justice system, and in the fullness of time, it now becomes even more evident. It seems strange that two of the lawyers in the crew claim to teach Constitutional Law. The outcome of this crew’s war on justice is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment “Equal Protection” clause. By persecuting lawyers who agree to represent election contest challenges, they have in effect eviscerated any possibility to have equal access to the courts, and that by definition is an assault on the Constitutional guarantee of the “Equal Protection” clause.
Their claim of “Our Work” doesn’t stand on scrutiny…
The description of their work is horrifying when you look closely. It is filled with baseless claims, half-truths, and outright fabrications, not to mention the careless disregard of evidence to the contrary of their assertion that there was no fraud. Regardless of their false assertions, we have found not just election process defects that can alter election outcomes, but sovereign fraud as well.
“In the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election, Trump-allied lawyers filed 65 lawsuits across the country to overturn the legitimate election results. Finding the assertions bogus and riddled with false statements, Republican- and Democratic-appointed judges uniformly dismissed the lawsuits. But success in the courtroom was not the only objective. Instead, the lawyers bringing these claims knew they were a key component of a larger effort to discredit the 2020 presidential election – and all future elections in which their preferred candidate lost.
The 65 Project is a bi-partisan effort to protect democracy and preserve the rule of law by deterring future attacks on our electoral system. We are holding accountable Big Lie Lawyers who bring fraudulent and malicious lawsuits to overturn legitimate election results, and working with bar associations to revitalize the disciplinary process so that lawyers, including public officials, who subvert democracy will be punished.”4
So in other words, SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP…
There are several “tells” in the statement of work above. A tell an unconscious action that is thought to betray an attempted deception.
First among them is, “Trump-allied lawyers filed 65 lawsuits across the country to overturn the legitimate election results.” There is an assumption not in evidence, that is “legitimate election results.” The amount of evidence that is now crushing those courts that dismissed cases before they were ever heard is overwhelming. The crew is attempting to convince us all of something that has not been proven to be true but is in question. The cases were dismissed before evidence was considered. That is just one of the big lies that the crew is promoting.
Second… we have questions related to the motive of the lawyers. “bringing these claims knew they were a key component of a larger effort to discredit the 2020 presidential election – and all future elections in which their preferred candidate lost.” That is a bold statement, to assume that because a lawyer is representing a client, said lawyer knew —read this as intends to go beyond the case at hand— they were key in a larger strategy to undermine future elections. Perhaps there is a bit of projection, a la Marc Elias, going on here.
Third… the mission is to, “[p]rotect democracy and preserve the rule of law by deterring future attacks on our electoral system.”
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Mark Finchem's Inside Track Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.