Phoenix, AZ July 14, 2023… The balkanization of the United States is underway, that is the imminent break-up of the nation, which is exactly what the World Economic Forum (WEF) wants. The pathway to complete destruction of our nation is the disintegration of relied upon institutions where we can settle disagreements in a neutral environment. Ever since I can remember, there has been a very public display of a two-tiered “justice’ system, and now it appears in this 5th Generation Warfare world, to be reaching a crescendo.
In a poll completed between July 24 & 28, 2022, the Trafalgar Group surveyed 1,080 likely general election voters; 79% said there are two tiers of justice: “one set of laws for politicians and Washington, D.C., insiders vs one set of laws for everyday Americans.” What is even more telling is, the political spectrum has significant split, “Along party lines, 66.7% of Democrats and 87.8% of Republicans said there were two tiers of justice.”1
And the trend continues. While I am not a fan of ex-VP Mike Pence for a host of reasons, he makes the point well in a recent interview where he is quoted saying, "I'm going to fight the Biden DOJ subpoena for me to appear before the grand jury because I believe it's unconstitutional and it's unprecedented," Pence told reporters. "Never before in American history has a vice president been summoned to appear in court to testify against the president with whom they serve."2
The two-tiered system is not just poor vs. rich, or elites vs. commoners, but now is political in crowd vs. political adversaries. Never before has an ex-President been harassed in the manner that President Donald J. Trump has been, but now that rubicon has been crossed, and those who crossed it have unleaded the hounds of hell on this nation, but then maybe that has been the plan all along.
There was a day when lawyers were held to reasonable ethical standards that promoted the notion memorialized in stone over the entryway to the Supreme Court of the United States, “equal justice for all.” These days it sounds like nothing more than a trip, altruistic footnote in history long passed. We are watching the legal profession shake itself apart to the extent that there will be no equal justice for all.
I’ve written before on the persecution of John Eastman by radical, perhaps even Marxist, lawyers under the moniker The 65 Project. These clowns are all about denying equal protection not just to the people represented by lawyers who have a legitimate reason to go to court, but they are attacking the lawyers themselves. While they may lay claim to ethical purity, even their Twitter descriptor drips with a pathetic attempt to justify their unethical actions with a clear propaganda message. “A bipartisan effort to hold accountable lawyers who engage in fraudulent abuse of the legal system to overturn election results and fuel insurrection.” Seriously?
Let’s take a closer look at their so-called mission. Bipartisan? The bulk of these folks are radical leftist attorneys who suffer from Fraud Denial Syndrome (FDS). Evidence like that which was the foundation for the Kari Lake challenge to the embarrassment of an”election” in Maricopa County Arizona, does not matter. The fact that election officials committed perjury openly and verifiably doesn’t matter. Evidence like that which I attempted to bring to court in order to question the then Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, but was prevented from doing so doesn’t matter. But to present such a case and the evidence of an irredeemably compromised election one needs an attorney. I think we would all like to know who are the Republican lawyers who are part of the bi-partisan joke?
Next let’s look at the “fraudulent abuse of the legal system to overturn election results.” Perhaps the hack that wrote this mission descriptor meant frivolous? You cannot over turn the results, they are what they are, and the results are the evidence. Just look at the litany of failures that disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of voters in Maricopa County Arizona, Fulton County Georgia, Wayne County Michigan and many more. Examples of at best malfeasance and maladministration, and at worst sovereign fraud. To borrow for Norton v. Shelby County language, “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” 3An election that does not follow the law should impose no duty, afford no protection, award no office, and in legal contemplation should be as inoperable as though it had never been held. Tim Canova, writing for The Federalist speaks to equal protection for of all people, lawyers…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Mark Finchem's Inside Track Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.