While Democrats Urge, "Defend Democracy"...
It appears that Democrats actually hate democracy, they loath We the People
Prescott, AZ February 5, 2024… From Colorado to Maine, and from Arizona to Georgia to Wisconsin, Democrat Secretaries of State —including Democrats registered as Republicans— and Elections Directors have sought to prevent a man, never convicted of “high crimes and misdemeanors” or convicted of the fraud of a so-called “insurrection” that was actually a well-orchestrated FBI run riot, they cannot abide the People exercising democratically elected representation by having a choice. This is the dystopian version of “demonacracy” that Democrats are trying to sell to the American People, and they ain’t buy’in it.
It is a fact, backed by mountains of evidence that the Marxist fringe-left wing of the Democrat party, conspiring with both the federal government apparatus and the various states has engaged in a coup d'é·tat. Frankly, their fear is understandable, given the penalty for non-Article III trials if convicted.
The look of fear on this woman’s face is understandable given the crimes she has engaged in, crimes that she knows are specific intent crimes because she is an attorney. Benny Johnson makes a solid point, Griswold is “disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Donald Trump to remain on the ballot,” even though he has done nothing wrong, and the record shows it.
Griswold is forced to admit, “It will be up to the American voters to save democracy in November.” Well no kidding Jena, it is always up to voter participation to save our democratically elected republic. But when the likes of you engage in election manipulation, and then knowingly destroy the evidence that you are mandated to protect by federal law —covering your tracks— can the voters save what you call democracy?”
Griswold like so many other demoncrats believe that the People are incapable of choosing a leader who will put them first as opposed to the new world order. And they are so terrified of repercussions that they are importing illegal aliens into the country to take the democratic election process away from the People, you know the People who are paying for their own demise at the hands of the slave-masters within the Democrat party. I am being too harsh you say? Really?
“Jim Crow 2.0” they scream like banshees…
What is a banshee? The mythical banshee, (“woman of the fairies”) is a supernatural being in Irish and other Celtic folklore whose mournful “keening,” or wailing screaming or lamentation, at night was believed to foretell the death of a member of the family of the person who heard the spirit. Perhaps in the Democrat and Uniparty confines, it is a supernatural being that is foretelling the death of the Democrat party itself.
While the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, a paper known for its radical leftist positions, published an article on “Jim Crow 2.0”1, it lacked substance concerning its complaints with Georgia election law updates designed to improve transparency and security. You know when they roll out the slick phrases, that feel like they have been market-tested, something isn’t quite right, beware. In the case of the use of the phrase “Jim Crow 2.0,” the election fraud gangsters seek to obfuscate their abuse of the election process by vilifying legislative attempts to shut down the various fraud vectors —pathways— that were used in past elections and have been proven to pervert the process.
In Arizona, home of the irredeemably compromised 2020 and 2022 elections in Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties, the Legislature passed a statute that would have prohibited the consolidation of precinct-level voting into “voting centers” and limited the size of precincts to 1,000 voters or less. This would have served to break up the locations where individuals with no right to vote, but who are registered anyway, from outside of a known community could infiltrate the election process and cast a ballot. Katie Hobbs, the forever questionable governor vetoed the bill.
Even with the enactment of new law to clamp down on election fraud vectors, it still requires men to follow the law.
Ya, sure it’s the law, but we’re not going to follow it…
When the Judicial and Executive branches of government collude to subvert the Legislative branch, we have a serious problem with “democracy” showing the transparent nature of consent is at risk. Take, for example, the matter involving Judge John Hannah, an artful write of prose, and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer, a vocal Trump hater.
There is no question that with mail-in elections —a system that demands heightened security and oversight—a vital component is the affidavit envelope that makes it clear that a specific ballot is tied to a specific voter, kinda. Once the signed envelope is opened, and the ballot is removed and mixed with thousands of other ballots, there is no connection between the voter, the ballot, and the envelope, which documents the affidavit. It is in every way a public record and should be, in a transparent “democracy,” available for examination, especially when there is a legal challenge in which it is alleged that signatures do not match voter registration cards, or are missing altogether.
Oh but wait, Judge Hannah opined, “The broad right of electoral participation outweighs the narrow interests of those who would continue to pick at the machinery of democracy.” What? Picking at the machinery of “democracy” is once again called scrutiny and oversight. It is what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis called sunshine. Every aspect of a contested election deserves scrutiny to satisfy the People that it was secure and fair, especially when the results cannot be reconciled with everything from ballot count to polling before and after Election Day.
“If the broad light of day could be let in upon men’s actions, it would purify them as the sun disinfects.” Justice Louis Brandeis (Harper’s Weekly, 1913)
Hannah could have taken the high road and recognized that the public right to know and to scrutinize does not interfere with the broad right of electoral participation, but he instead undermined the People’s confidence in the process. To make matters worse…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Mark Finchem's Inside Track Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.